How to turn a Traditional Motorsailer into a Sailing Boat

Snowgoose-1

Well-known member
Joined
2 Jun 2015
Messages
733
Visit site
Is that true? I pity your old dad. I never really coveted an Eclipse (or a Southerly) because their designers appear to have worked so hard to keep the coachroof low, it looks like the lower helm must have a worm's eye view over the bow. But it never occurred to me the pursuit of sleekness didn't improve their sailing ability. Far better off with a full-height wheelhouse and a sailplan like Laminar's.

It's funny to read yachtsmen's reasoning and reflect that almost all seagoing professionals expect (and are granted) a sheltered helm as a basic essential comfort. Only in the amateur world could it be enviable to pay, hugely, for conditions that would put commercial seafarers on strike.
.
I think that we are often socially conditioned with attitudes to weather conditions are good or bad. Nature makes no big deal about it and my grandson loves being out in the wet splashing in puddles . I've never heard him complaining about any weather conditions . We used to be like that didn't we ? . The conditioning comes later in life.

I now try to look upon weather as neutral. Not good or bad. I've enjoyed my UK sailing a lot more.
 

rotrax

Well-known member
Joined
17 Dec 2010
Messages
15,564
Location
South Oxon, Littlehampton and Wellington, NZ.
Visit site
Fair points. A lot of people ( probably most if sales are considered ), sail partly because it is an outdoor pursuit and don't want to sit inside a fair approximation of a garden shed.

But fair winds to those who do.

.
You must ask yourself Doug, if it were really black dark, pissing down, cold and very windy, would you prefer to stand at the helm of an aft cockpit yacht in hat, boots and foulies or be inside, in a comfortable swiveling upholstered seat with arm rests in tee shirt and shorts, all the nav station laid out in front, no raindrops on your specs?

If you answer truthfully, and the aft cockpit yacht dressed up for the foul conditions is a yes, can we assume you would ignore the shelter of a garden shed and stand outside on the lawn in the wind and pissing rain?

First Mate and I have owned three aft cockpit yachts before our current boat. We have endured the weather in the fag-end of the night watches on long passages. With good clothing it is OK. We tend to do in excess of 1500 NM's each year, many night passages as we prefer to arrive at our destination in daylight. We travel farther and faster now, and arrive fresher and more relaxed.

Our previous boat, an Island Packet 350, gave us the night passage of our lives.

We had left Portland, inside passage at dusk. By the time we had rounded the Bill and taken a board North to miss the tail of the race it was getting dark. First Mate was taking a nap, I was sitting in a corner seat, main pegged in tight, engine on, heading for Brixham across Lyme Bay, into a rising 5.

The ensign started flapping across my face-wind had changed! Got the staysail and genoa out, freed the sheets and we sailed in perfect conditions down the moonbeam across Lyme Bay. We made a perfect landfall at Brixham entrance, the best night sail we ever had.

We would not be having this exchange of views were it always so - but it is not!

Before we bought our current boat we made two columns, 'Must Haves' and 'Nice to Haves'.

The SP Cruiser was the nearest to fullfiling what we required. I sold my collection of 32 Vintage, Classic and Racing motorbikes to assist in funding the purchase.

The 'we' is a very important part of that short sentence. Our sailing, like our life together, is a partnership.

Without our current vessel or something similar, I would be sailing on my own. The right boat has kept both of us enjoying sailing.

Result! :)
 

dunedin

Well-known member
Joined
3 Feb 2004
Messages
12,661
Location
Boat (over winters in) the Clyde
Visit site
You must ask yourself Doug, if it were really black dark, pissing down, cold and very windy, would you prefer to stand at the helm of an aft cockpit yacht in hat, boots and foulies or be inside, in a comfortable swiveling upholstered seat with arm rests in tee shirt and shorts, all the nav station laid out in front, no raindrops on your specs?
…….
I still don’t get this concept.
Again, nobody needs to “stand at the helm” of any modern boat (except for rare moments, like arriving at a berth). If you are enjoying the sailing in a thoroughbred boat in good weather helm, if not autopilot on.
And most people on here are not entirely work bound, plus have weather forecasts these days. If dark back and pissing down don’t go sailing. Wait an hour or so and generally changed,
Have had 4 sails so far in 2024 (at 55+N) and yet to put an oilskin jacket on.
It is great that people like different things - but some concepts like “standing at the helm in the rain” are largely as archaic as RDF and a Seafarer echo sounder.
 

doug748

Well-known member
Joined
1 Oct 2002
Messages
12,867
Location
UK. South West.
Visit site
You must ask yourself Doug, if it were really black dark, pissing down, cold and very windy, would you prefer to stand at the helm of an aft cockpit yacht in hat, boots and foulies or be inside, in a comfortable swiveling upholstered seat with arm rests in tee shirt and shorts, all the nav station laid out in front, no raindrops on your specs?

If you answer truthfully, and the aft cockpit yacht dressed up for the foul conditions is a yes, can we assume you would ignore the shelter of a garden shed and stand outside on the lawn in the wind and pissing rain?

First Mate and I have owned three aft cockpit yachts before our current boat. We have endured the weather in the fag-end of the night watches on long passages. With good clothing it is OK. We tend to do in excess of 1500 NM's each year, many night passages as we prefer to arrive at our destination in daylight. We travel farther and faster now, and arrive fresher and more relaxed.

Our previous boat, an Island Packet 350, gave us the night passage of our lives.

We had left Portland, inside passage at dusk. By the time we had rounded the Bill and taken a board North to miss the tail of the race it was getting dark. First Mate was taking a nap, I was sitting in a corner seat, main pegged in tight, engine on, heading for Brixham across Lyme Bay, into a rising 5.

The ensign started flapping across my face-wind had changed! Got the staysail and genoa out, freed the sheets and we sailed in perfect conditions down the moonbeam across Lyme Bay. We made a perfect landfall at Brixham entrance, the best night sail we ever had.

We would not be having this exchange of views were it always so - but it is not!

Before we bought our current boat we made two columns, 'Must Haves' and 'Nice to Haves'.

The SP Cruiser was the nearest to fullfiling what we required. I sold my collection of 32 Vintage, Classic and Racing motorbikes to assist in funding the purchase.

The 'we' is a very important part of that short sentence. Our sailing, like our life together, is a partnership.

Without our current vessel or something similar, I would be sailing on my own. The right boat has kept both of us enjoying sailing.

Result! :)


Thing is, some people (elsewhere) tend to want to start and settle some mythic argument about the best boat, when everyone mostly buys the boat they want and leave it at that.

Sounds like you have made a good choice, no problem with it at all but it would not suit me.

.
 

dancrane

Well-known member
Joined
29 Dec 2010
Messages
10,138
Visit site
...you make my point for me. Some people might find a boat insulated from chills etc to be appealing. But not everyone.
The point, which I make often but which seems to be wilfully or just inevitably misunderstood, is the benefit of the option to steer indoors. Not imprisonment in an airless overheated cabin; just the option, and only for as long as it is preferred, to avoid spending watches enduring all weathers.

I love the English summertime - we tented every year - but there's a point on the best July evening when the cool breeze stops being relaxing.

At that point, as well as for most of October through April, plus disappointing wet days in summer, the option to steer indoors turns sailing from something Tilmanesque into something as comfortable as time on shore - you go outdoors or you stay inside, usually decided by comfort.

Under way, most sailing yachts deny their crews that incredibly basic option.
 

dancrane

Well-known member
Joined
29 Dec 2010
Messages
10,138
Visit site
...professional seamen are on vessels propelled by engines, not sails. Rather different from recreational SAILING?
Quite different...you must recognise that as being the point we've attempted to make over so many pages? I suspect you do, but you refuse to be seen to.

The trouble identified by Rotrax, Laminar, myself (and others, honest hardy fellows like Stemar who don't deny shelter would be welcome at times) is that while motorboat designers don't obsess over aerodynamics, and commercial seafarers would offer their employers a collective middle finger if ship-designers obliged the crews to go without weather protection...

...conversely, recreational sailing boat designers exhibit the laughable assumption you imply yourself - that weather forecasting and the freedom to sail only when it suits, mean nobody sails except when it's pleasant to be outdoors.

It isn't true. Even Flaming's dad liked the idea of the option to retreat and steer inside.

The unfortunate fact that building a yacht with dual helms (and other adaptations reflecting more use of the motor) increases its cost, means fewer buyers willing to accept the realities of our weather. Bizarrely, that has led to a perverse belief that sheltered helms aren't really desired at all.
 

fredrussell

Well-known member
Joined
24 Mar 2015
Messages
3,254
Visit site
, that has led to a perverse belief that sheltered helms aren't really desired at all.
I think all of us that prefer an open cockpit are quite happy to accept that sheltered helms are desired, but by a minority of boat buyers. My favourite place to sit and steer boat is on the coaming aft, leaning back against the pushpit with the tiller extension in my hand. I have a great view forward over the coachroof. My view is not blocked by a big ol’ wheelhouse, which suits me.
 
Last edited:

rotrax

Well-known member
Joined
17 Dec 2010
Messages
15,564
Location
South Oxon, Littlehampton and Wellington, NZ.
Visit site
Thing is, some people (elsewhere) tend to want to start and settle some mythic argument about the best boat, when everyone mostly buys the boat they want and leave it at that.

Sounds like you have made a good choice, no problem with it at all but it would not suit me.

.
I agree with the basic sentiment, but disagree with your post #103.

It is very possible to be I/C of an aft cockpit leisure vessel and be inside or tucked up under a sprayhood while the Auto Pilot keeps a course.

But have you enough forward visibility to comply with COLREGS? And, around where we sail, avoid the very many pot and net buoys?

I/We take our resposibilities as Skipper/Watchkeeper far more seriously than that and are always vigilant.

Being stuck on a pot buoy off Rathlin Island and requiring the Portrush RNLI crew to get us off taught us a very salutary lesson.

That should not happen again!
 

rotrax

Well-known member
Joined
17 Dec 2010
Messages
15,564
Location
South Oxon, Littlehampton and Wellington, NZ.
Visit site
I think all of us that prefer an open cockpit are quite happy to accept that sheltered helms are desired, but by a minority of boat buyers. My favourite place to sit and steer boat is on the coaming aft, leaning back against the pushpit with the tiller extension in my hand. I have a great view forward over the coachroof. My view is not blocked by a big ol’ wheelhouse which suits me.
If you were steering a wheelhouse/pilothouse vessel your vision would not be blocked-you would be looking through a protective screen, inside, keeping dry and warm.

My very last word on the subject. I am known, in our Gosport Club, as "That Bastard who let my wife see his boat!" ;) (y)
 

flaming

Well-known member
Joined
24 Mar 2004
Messages
15,155
Visit site
The point, which I make often but which seems to be wilfully or just inevitably misunderstood, is the benefit of the option to steer indoors. Not imprisonment in an airless overheated cabin; just the option, and only for as long as it is preferred, to avoid spending watches enduring all weathers.

I love the English summertime - we tented every year - but there's a point on the best July evening when the cool breeze stops being relaxing.

At that point, as well as for most of October through April, plus disappointing wet days in summer, the option to steer indoors turns sailing from something Tilmanesque into something as comfortable as time on shore - you go outdoors or you stay inside, usually decided by comfort.

Under way, most sailing yachts deny their crews that incredibly basic option.
You talk as if the option to steer from inside is a feature that is completely detached from the rest of the boat. That you could have a boat with whatever performance you wanted and slap an inside helm on it and job’s a goodu’n.

It doesn’t work that way.

As for feeling sorry for my dad… thanks but no need. He wound up with a much better boat than either the moody or the southerly, once we came to understand the compromise that those boats came with.
 

BobnLesley

Well-known member
Joined
1 Dec 2005
Messages
3,622
Location
Aground in Yorkshire awaiting a very high tide
Visit site
If you were steering a wheelhouse/pilothouse vessel your vision would not be blocked-you would be looking through a protective screen, inside, keeping dry and warm...
Pre-supposing your 'protective screen' is not continually being sluiced by breaking waves or lashing rain, if it were your visibility might be impaired more than the daft bugger sat in his open cockpit, certainly with regards to spotting something like an unlit fishing buoy, that helmsman in the open cockpit also has more/better opportunities to move about to see around/past fixed obstructions in his field of vision.
As to the OP's original point, to my mind the easiest, quickest an most cost effective way of 'turning a traditional motorsailer into a decent sailing yacht would be to turn on your computer, connect to the internet and open Appolloduck or similar; use that to sell your under-canvassed, over-weight motorsailer, then take the money achieved from that and buy a real sail boat... Job done.
 

Laminar Flow

Well-known member
Joined
14 Jan 2020
Messages
1,851
Location
West Coast
Visit site
As to the OP's original point, to my mind the easiest, quickest an most cost effective way of 'turning a traditional motorsailer into a decent sailing yacht would be to turn on your computer, connect to the internet and open Appolloduck or similar; use that to sell your under-canvassed, over-weight motorsailer, then take the money achieved from that and buy a real sail boat... Job done.

Now where would the fun be in that?

Your comment is founded on the same defeatist and in so many ways ignorant attitude exhibited by some of the most dedicated proponents of our boat's brand: i.e. "They are as good as they can be or if you want to sail fast buy a yacht." Nice try, but I've already gone through the CW gaslighting program.

All in all, I'm quite happy with our "stealth" sailing yacht. To date we have managed to sail past a few unsuspecting, "real sailing boats", including a Pogo 30 in light going and we do so in complete comfort, no matter the weather. Perhaps I just like messing with peoples' preconceived perceptions.

Considering that quite a few people on this forum sail boats that are considerably more expensive than our 40 + years old little ship, including the cost of all the improvement we have made, though quite a few had nothing to do with her sailing performance, I find the discussion as to cost somewhat spurious. Just for example, the price for a new Fisher 25 is in the range of a 100,000 pounds sterling. I would never spend that kind of money, we most certainly haven't, not even close, and certainly not on a 25 footer. As said, over the span of many years of ownership, we haven't spent more than the equivalent of a midsize car, including the initial purchase price.
 

Cptsideways

New member
Joined
28 Jan 2024
Messages
9
Visit site
On the subject of in or outside helm, we have both on our Finnsailer. We can sail with the rear tent up or down, pilothouse open or closed, all lines leading back to cockpit. You can be as warm or cold and wet as you like & we sail all year round in Scotland! Last trip it was sub zero outside for three days and nights. It's a great combination.
 

dunedin

Well-known member
Joined
3 Feb 2004
Messages
12,661
Location
Boat (over winters in) the Clyde
Visit site
……..
All in all, I'm quite happy with our "stealth" sailing yacht. To date we have managed to sail past a few unsuspecting, "real sailing boats", including a Pogo 30 in light going and we do so in complete comfort, no matter the weather. Perhaps I just like messing with peoples' preconceived perceptions.
……..
Wow. Are we in danger of getting a replacement for the mythical Andersen 22?

We once overtook Drum downwind in light airs off Cloch Point. But that doesn’t prove that a 32 foot Westerly Fulmar is faster than an 80 foot ex-Whitbread ocean racer. Just that in very exceptional circumstances, extreme sail set and trim can make more difference. We had both borne off onto a run, and we immediately let the main right out and goose winged.
Meanwhile the pro-skipper on Drum kept his mainsail pinned tight in (with no foresail set) - as he had decided that with his mate serving champagne to the paying guests, now was not the time to fiddle with running backstays, boom across the cockpit and setting up a preventer.
Being the Clyde, 10 minutes later the wind had changed to a reach - and the mate had put down her tray of champagne flutes. They eased the mainsail out and shot off into the distance.

Certainly done a great job on the rig. But can‘t defeat the laws of hydrodynamics.
So perhaps need to be careful before a “Colvic 32“ becomes used as instead of “Anderson 22” - fine vessels though both are.
 

dancrane

Well-known member
Joined
29 Dec 2010
Messages
10,138
Visit site
As for feeling sorry for my dad… thanks but no need. He wound up with a much better boat than either the moody or the southerly, once we came to understand the compromise that those boats came with.
I'm glad he found what he wanted, that really is all that matters. ;)

There was a time when my Dad thought he might want something with an inside steering position.
I'm in that same position, and I too have never raced, nor had any desire to start. I like summer sailing for the peace and independence, and the fulfilment of a free ride. If the boat is doing her best, then I've done mine - actual speed under sail amid modern traffic is scarcely significant.

But for me, life is too short to pay what boat ownership costs, just to spend precious leisure days working against inevitable headwinds in our grotty climate. The summer isn't long or reliable enough, and the rest of the year is money burned as berthing fees.

If all our weather was the best of summer, it really would be different. On this breezy February night (I hear the rain slamming the window), nothing would persuade me aboard any open cockpit yacht; but even now, I believe a passage in Laminar's wheelhouse would be very agreeable.

I like the ability of displacement motorboats to provide imperturbable calm en route without obliging the crew in any way, least of all keeping them on deck in conditions which, on shore, would drive all but loons indoors. Only the cost of fuel clouds the motorboat scene.

Two different forms of boating, theoretically requiring two different boats. The pity of the problem is how little research and development has pursued a good compromise, largely because sailing men are so resistant to its advance. Laminar Flow has done great work improving the sailing of a hull widely believed only good for motoring, allowing both the fulfilling pursuit of actively sailing her, or utter relaxation under power.

Sotonmet says force 5/6 SW, and the rain appears to be an all-nighter. Would you honestly rather be sitting outside?

Everything's been said at least thrice, and nobody has any interest in changing what they thought already. Good ol' forum. Goodnight! :)
.
 

Laminar Flow

Well-known member
Joined
14 Jan 2020
Messages
1,851
Location
West Coast
Visit site
Wow. Are we in danger of getting a replacement for the mythical Andersen 22?

We once overtook Drum downwind in light airs off Cloch Point. But that doesn’t prove that a 32 foot Westerly Fulmar is faster than an 80 foot ex-Whitbread ocean racer. Just that in very exceptional circumstances, extreme sail set and trim can make more difference. We had both borne off onto a run, and we immediately let the main right out and goose winged.
Meanwhile the pro-skipper on Drum kept his mainsail pinned tight in (with no foresail set) - as he had decided that with his mate serving champagne to the paying guests, now was not the time to fiddle with running backstays, boom across the cockpit and setting up a preventer.
Being the Clyde, 10 minutes later the wind had changed to a reach - and the mate had put down her tray of champagne flutes. They eased the mainsail out and shot off into the distance.

Certainly done a great job on the rig. But can‘t defeat the laws of hydrodynamics.
So perhaps need to be careful before a “Colvic 32“ becomes used as instead of “Anderson 22” - fine vessels though both are.

Perhaps you need to brush up on your understanding of hydrodynamics and physics.

Broad reach, leaving Paimpol. Both of us with just the genny up as there it not enough water at half tide to head into the wind to raise the main. They were some two hundred metres ahead, by the time Mom & Pop here had finally managed to get themselves out of the lock. By the time we had reached open water, we had sailed past them, simple.
How this is possible is also simple physics and no laws of hydrodynamics were violated. At relative speeds below 0.9, the resistance curves for light and heavy vessels are remarkably similar, so that our 33 sqm genny provided more drive to resistance, than the Podo 30's 26 sqm, notwithstanding the fact that our displacement is considerably greater than that of the Pogo.
With more wind and at higher speeds, the Pogo will of course be faster, as the CW's resistance, due to it's weight, increases exponentially.
The only myth worth mentioning here, is that heavy boats are invariably slow in light weather.

And yes, I have heard all the other reasons why we would have been faster, including that the Pogo was carrying next year's moules harvest on her bottom to, the crew were a bunch of incompetent idiots. However, the Glenan keep their boats in good nick, even by French standards, and at least one person has to be on board who can identify the pointy end.

I do understand that some vessels, such as the Anderson 22, operate outside of the laws of macro physics. Alas, we don't.
 
Last edited:

Snowgoose-1

Well-known member
Joined
2 Jun 2015
Messages
733
Visit site
Two different forms of boating, theoretically requiring two different boats. The pity of the problem is how little research and development has pursued a good compromise, largely because sailing men are so resistant to its advance. Laminar Flow has done great work improving the sailing of a hull widely believed only good for motoring, allowing both the fulfilling pursuit of actively sailing her, or utter relaxation under power.

Sotonmet says force 5/6 SW, and the rain appears to be an all-nighter. Would you honestly rather be sitting outside?

Everything's been said at least thrice, and nobody has any interest in changing what they thought already. Good ol' forum. Goodnight! :)
.

I'm glad he found what he wanted, that really is all that matters. ;)


I'm in that same position, and I too have never raced, nor had any desire to start. I like summer sailing for the peace and independence, and the fulfilment of a free ride. If the boat is doing her best, then I've done mine - actual speed under sail amid modern traffic is scarcely significant.

But for me, life is too short to pay what boat ownership costs, just to spend precious leisure days working against inevitable headwinds in our grotty climate. The summer isn't long or reliable enough, and the rest of the year is money burned as berthing fees.

If all our weather was the best of summer, it really would be different. On this breezy February night (I hear the rain slamming the window), nothing would persuade me aboard any open cockpit yacht; but even now, I believe a passage in Laminar's wheelhouse would be very agreeable.

I like the ability of displacement motorboats to provide imperturbable calm en route without obliging the crew in any way, least of all keeping them on deck in conditions which, on shore, would drive all but loons indoors. Only the cost of fuel clouds the motorboat scene.

Two different forms of boating, theoretically requiring two different boats. The pity of the problem is how little research and development has pursued a good compromise, largely because sailing men are so resistant to its advance. Laminar Flow has done great work improving the sailing of a hull widely believed only good for motoring, allowing both the fulfilling pursuit of actively sailing her, or utter relaxation under power.

Sotonmet says force 5/6 SW, and the rain appears to be an all-nighter. Would you honestly rather be sitting outside?

Everything's been said at least thrice, and nobody has any interest in changing what they thought already. Good ol' forum. Goodnight! :)
.
I agree, I think Laminar Flow has done a great job in modifying his boat to meet his needs . Hopefully, it may give other motorsailor's confidence to make changes if they want to.

With regard to weather , the world has moved on from plastic macs and duffle coats.
Hi tec clothing has somewhat transformed sailing in places like the UK. Add perhaps a sprayhood and there is no real need to be cold, wet and sweaty .
 

Chiara’s slave

Well-known member
Joined
14 Apr 2022
Messages
6,022
Location
Western Solent
Visit site
I agree, I think Laminar Flow has done a great job in modifying his boat to meet his needs . Hopefully, it may give other motorsailor's confidence to make changes if they want to.

With regard to weather , the world has moved on from plastic macs and duffle coats.
Hi tec clothing has somewhat transformed sailing in places like the UK. Add perhaps a sprayhood and there is no real need to be cold, wet and sweaty .
Just so. As a sailor of the polar opposite of a motorsailor, we are rarely cold or wet. We have a sprayhood and good waterproofs, and modern layered warm gear. And anything else is the price we pay for performance. I personally can’t see the point of starting with a boat designed to be a poor sailer, and making into a mediocre one, but if the OP is pleased with his creation, great. Theres much to love about making something your own. I have no doubt he’s improved it’s sailing ability. Whether it’s as quick as an Andersen 22, there's only one way to find out!
 
Top